【「付費」上「金錢豐盛」課程？】
「要付費」的「金錢豐盛」課程是有問題的。
請仔細跟隨我的思路。
如果傳承的人真的金錢豐盛，他怎麼還會需要開「收費」課程？
想要教人、直接教就好了；想要分享、直接分享就好了、網路也可以直接分享啊。
要能量平衡的話，金錢那麼豐盛、去額外消費或享受服務或自己跟宇宙充電不就補回來了？
怎麼想，「真正」「金錢豐盛」的人都完全沒必要透過開辦「收費的金錢豐盛課程」來賺錢或平衡能量。
事實上，許多付費金錢豐盛課程的內容實際傳承的真正程序是：
「開一個收費課程叫做『金錢豐盛』課程」然後就會有人付錢報名，你就「金錢豐盛」了。
學員們實際上學到的內容或程序就是：「開一個收費課程叫做『金錢豐盛』課程」。
然而，他們如果不想當老師或開收費課程，就會覺得自己錢流失了、上了課學了點什麼但是沒有真的金錢豐盛，因為他們沒有執行「關鍵卻沒說」的步驟就是「開辦金錢收費課程」。
然而他們「本來」就會收到宇宙各式各樣的金錢流動或福報，卻會把那個現象解釋為因為我付費上了金錢豐盛課程；其實只要財富或自信方面的能量有所提升，自然有財富方面的能量落差而有流動現象，無論是不是透過金錢豐盛課程而成長的。
我要說的是比較高維度的概念，聽清楚了，我用其他例子解釋吧。
以「先有雞還是先有蛋」的悖論問題來說。
解答是，「先有『先有雞還是先有蛋』這個問題」。
這種心智矩陣很有趣，你會發現內容只會使心智打結，但是要是超越內容，會看到問題本身就被設計好是一個心智矩陣。
當你開始思考「先有雞還是先有蛋」，心智就落入了這個問題。
然而要跳出心智維度的方式就是「忽視內容」直接看問題或悖論本身被創造的意圖。
悖論被創造的意義是讓心智自我覺察到自己思考出現了障礙，或遇到了心智層次無法解決的問題，進而看到心智的限制或心智本身並不是萬能的。
這就是維度解謎的樂趣。
回到「金錢豐盛付費課程」吧，學員去上這門課的過程實際上的行為是什麼？是「付費」換得一個資訊叫做「金錢豐盛」。
可是如果資訊本身叫做金錢豐盛，心智聽到「金錢豐盛」這四個字就應該要金錢豐盛了。
事實上金錢在地球是稀缺與競爭性與被控制的資源，所以「金錢豐盛」是個幌子或陷阱，當心智被這個內容吸引而付出能量去交換時，已經入陷阱了。
你可以覺察到「金錢豐盛」這四個字其實有它的隱形悖論，創造這四個字的人的意圖極端複雜。
我來提供另一個方案吧，我所使用的叫做「無限豐盛」，它本身吸引的超越金錢包含一切，而且不用任何代價，我直接在網路上公開這個信念給任何需要的心智。
你不用花一毛錢，因為我真的無限豐盛，也活在那裡面，我不用透過收取任何費用來交換這訊息，我無限豐盛是無條件的，也要持有者無條件的無限豐盛，這就是我的意圖。
我破解金錢煩惱的信念很簡單：「如果我不是無條件豐盛的，那我就甘願餓死。」事實證明我是無條件豐盛的，因為我現在還活著，所以我的確解除了金錢的煩惱。
結論：要付費的金錢豐盛課程是有條件的，學員也只會學到有條件的金錢豐盛，即使老師天花亂墜信誓旦旦或確有其實力，但老師事實上還是透過「收費」這個「先決條件」來交易資訊，代表那老師或傳承者其實得到金錢豐盛這個知識的時候也是付費的。
換句話說，如果老師或傳承者獲得的金錢豐盛是真的無條件的，他也不會收取學員任何費用，因為他要是真的活在金錢豐盛裡面，也不會需要任何人付出任何代價來獲得；因為他獲得的時候也沒有代價，如果學員得到的是這種金錢豐盛，才是真正得到無條件的金錢豐盛，否則就不是。
跟上我了嗎？
最後簡潔的說明：心智很簡單，它只會如實的複製它所傳承到的東西，包括語言信念或行為，看一個人除了要看他說了什麼、還要看他做了什麼。
如果傳承者嘴上談「金錢豐盛」，實際上的行為卻包括收費，可以百分之百保證他要不是學錯了，就是後來自己包裝拿來收費，無論如何，他的東西是假的。
本篇單純針對「需要付費的金錢豐盛課程」這個現象做解構；「傳承金錢豐盛卻要收費」，這本身是矛盾的。
（另一方案是採取隨喜贊助，使學員自由支付任何費用、或不支付也沒關係，沒有任何條件。）
— — —
特別補充：「金錢豐盛」以外的課程不包含在內，其他付費課程主打其他主題，課程中有談到金錢豐盛也不包含在內，單純主要針對「主打金錢豐盛的付費課程」。
「金錢靈氣」也不包含在內：金錢靈氣本質是下載宇宙無限能量，而非「從另一個人身上吸取靈氣」、特此說明。「顯化豐盛」也不包含在內，因為沒有提及金錢，故沒有悖論疑慮。
本文針對「金錢豐盛」這四個字的特定專有名詞與排列組合進行考察、表明這四個字本身是有問題的心智程序、它引導心智產生矛盾；這四個字以外的其它字組一概不包含。
感謝。
【”Paying for” the “Abundance of Money” Course?】
There is an issue with the “paying for” the “abundance of money” course.
Please follow my train of thought closely.
If the person teaching it truly possesses abundant wealth, why would they need to offer a “paid” course?
If they want to teach, they could simply teach directly.
If they want to share, they could share directly; the internet also provides a direct means of sharing.
If energy balance is desired, with such abundant wealth, any extra expenses, service enjoyment, or recharging with the universe would naturally replenish it, right?
How can one believe that someone truly “abundant in money” would need to resort to offering a “paid course on money abundance” to earn money or balance energy?
In reality, many paid courses on money abundance are structured like this: “Create a paid course called ‘Money Abundance’”; then people will pay to enroll, and you become “abundant in money.”
What students essentially learn or experience is: “Create a paid course called ‘Money Abundance’.”
However, if they do not want to become teachers or offer paid courses, they may feel that their money has been spent, that they have learned something from the course but haven’t truly achieved money abundance.
This is because they haven’t carried out the “unspoken key” step, which is “starting a money-paying course.”
Yet, they might have already been receiving various forms of financial flow or blessings from the universe, but they interpret this phenomenon as a result of enrolling in the “money abundance” course.
In reality, as wealth or confidence-related energy rises, there will naturally be fluctuations in the energy of wealth; this growth doesn’t necessarily come from a course on money abundance.
What I am discussing here is a higher-dimensional concept.
Listen carefully, let me explain using another example.
Consider the paradox of “which came first, the chicken or the egg?”
The answer is, “The question of ‘which came first, the chicken or the egg?’”
This kind of mental matrix is interesting; you’ll find that focusing on the content only knots the mind, but transcending the content reveals that the problem itself is a mental matrix intentionally designed.
When you start pondering “which came first, the chicken or the egg,” your mind falls into this question.
However, to step out of the mental dimension, you need to “disregard the content” and directly perceive the intention behind creating the question or paradox.
The purpose of creating a paradox is to make the mind self-aware of the obstacles in its thinking, or to encounter problems that the mental level cannot solve, thereby recognizing the limitations of the mind or that the mind itself isn’t all-powerful.
This is the joy of deciphering dimensions.
Returning to the topic of “paying for money abundance courses,” what is the actual behavior of students who attend these courses?
It’s to “pay” in exchange for information about “money abundance.”
But if the information itself is about money abundance, upon hearing the words “money abundance,” the mind should already have money abundance.
In fact, money is a scarce, competitive, and controlled resource on Earth, so “money abundance” is a facade or trap.
When the mind is drawn into this content and expends energy to make an exchange, it has already fallen into a trap.
You might notice that the phrase “money abundance” actually holds an underlying paradox, and the intention behind creating these words is extremely intricate.
Let me propose an alternative solution; I call it “Infinite Abundance.”
It naturally encompasses everything beyond money and comes at no cost.
I openly share this belief with anyone in need on the internet.
You don’t have to spend a cent because I am truly infinitely abundant, living within it.
I don’t need to charge any fees to exchange this message; my infinite abundance is unconditional, and I intend the same for the recipients.
The belief that eradicates money worries is simple: “If I am not unconditionally abundant, then I’m willing to starve.” As the evidence shows, I am unconditionally abundant, since I’m still alive; thus, I have truly dissolved my money worries.
Conclusion: Paid courses on money abundance come with conditions, and students will only learn about conditional money abundance.
Even if the teacher confidently asserts or genuinely possesses the capability, the fact remains that they are still exchanging information through the “fee” precondition, indicating that when the teacher or transmitter gained the knowledge of money abundance, they also paid for it.
In other words, if the money abundance that the teacher or transmitter acquired is genuinely unconditional, they wouldn’t charge students any fees.
If they truly live in money abundance, they wouldn’t need anyone to pay a price to obtain it; there was no cost for them to acquire it either.
Consequently, only if students receive this kind of unconditional money abundance is it genuinely unconditional. Otherwise, it’s not.
Are you following along so far?
In a concise explanation: the mind is simple; it merely replicates what it has inherited, including language, beliefs, or behaviors. When evaluating an individual, it’s important to consider not only what they say but also what they do.
If a transmitter discusses “money abundance” verbally but includes charging fees in their actual behavior, you can be a hundred percent certain that either they have misunderstood or later repackaged it for charging. Either way, what they offer is not genuine.
This article purely deconstructs the phenomenon of “paying for money abundance courses”; the contradiction lies in “transmitting money abundance but charging fees.”
(Another option is to adopt a voluntary sponsorship approach, allowing students to pay freely or not pay at all, without any conditions.)
Special Note: Courses other than “money abundance” are not included here; other paid courses focus on different topics, and even if they mention money abundance, they are not part of this analysis.
“Money Reiki” is also not included here: The essence of money Reiki is tapping into unlimited cosmic energy, not “absorbing Reiki from another person.” This clarification is provided.
“Manifesting abundance” is also not included, as it does not mention money, therefore there are no concerns of contradiction.
This article examines the specific proprietary terms and arrangement of the phrase “money abundance,” indicating that the phrase itself carries problematic mental programming that leads to contradictions. No other word combinations beyond these four words are considered.
Thank you.
